We work with founders and investors to identify and address specific financial needs. Understanding a frontier business and building the necessary capabilities takes time, commitment, mindset, expertise, and depth. We structure engagements to include all of these foundational blocks.
Founders buy a capability they do not yet have.
Investors buy reduced risk on capital already committed.
Each engagement structure below runs through its own sequence of stages, customized to the needs of each group.
Engagements are designed to partner with founders in building finance capabilities that support their vision.
Assessment of the current financial state. We review existing models, finance processes, unit economics, reporting cadence, capital plan and pricing logic, and interview the people who actually make and execute decisions. Deliberately short, producing findings that let both sides evaluate the working relationship before committing to more.
Right when the problem is felt but not yet defined.
A defined scope with agreed-upon deliverables and a timeline — building the model, defining the unit economics, implementing budgeting and forecasting, incorporating AI tools, constructing ROI-based business case, designing the pricing architecture, preparing investor materials for the raise, etc.
Right when the deliverable is known and the end state is clear.
Embedded senior financial leadership on a part-time basis, committed as a set number of days per month. Scope might include financial close, audits, diligence, board preparation, capital raise, planning cycles, and the recurring finance activities that do not fit inside a project scope.
Right when the need is continuous but a full-time hire is premature.
A single urgent question answered under time pressure — a board is asking something the team cannot yet answer, a term sheet needs an economic defense, a pricing decision is due. Narrow by design and priced accordingly.
Right when there is one question and a date it has to be answered by.
A standing outside perspective on financial matters, with availability between board sessions. Usually follows a completed engagement rather than starting one — and deliberately optional, because it should be chosen for being useful rather than because the company was left dependent.
Right when the capability is built and what is wanted is a second read.
Engagements are designed to run with the fund or, post-close, with a portfolio company.
Commercial and financial diligence on a target — pressure-testing the unit economics, path to profitability, assumptions underneath the model, ability of the finance foundation to support the business growth. Particularly useful where the business has no comparable to benchmark against.
Right when the thesis depends on economics that needs to be independently modeled or tested.
Standing up the finance function immediately after an investment closes — systems and processes, cash management, investor communications, reporting cadence, financial planning architecture, unit economics definition, and the capital deployment framework.
Right when a new investment has capital but no financial infrastructure.
Engagements across portfolio companies as needs arise. A second read on economics when a partner wants one, a model that does not sit right, a pricing structure that may leave value on the table, a business case that needs an independent review before the capital is committed. Structured as a retainer or on an hourly basis.
Right when the fund needs flexibility in financial support.
Diligence on a company and advisory work for that same company are not taken on together. Where a conflict could arise, it is raised before the engagement begins.
We focus on producing the outcome rather than activity. Every engagement starts with the problem statement, a hypothesis, agreed-upon deliverables, and a defined end.
We work with the team, not against them. We are as interested in the success of the company as the people who work there. But we also recognize the importance of maintaining our independence to provide objective insights and challenge the status quo when necessary.
We build for the future, not just the present. Scale puts enormous pressure on having the right foundation that makes scale value-accretive and sustainable. We build for scale that doesn't break the business.
To truly understand something, you must break it down to its irreducible truths. Then reason upwards from there, instead of relying on assumptions or convention. This approach is at the core of our engagement model.
Every engagement starts the same way — a direct discussion about what you are building, what challenges you face, and how we can partner. No cost, no obligation, and a straight answer about whether we're a good fit for each other.
Inquire about working with us